George Santayana's Marginalia: A Critical Selection, Volume 1: Abell-Lucretius
quantity 1. Retail caliber PDF.
In his essay "Imagination," George Santayana writes, "There are books during which the footnotes, or the reviews scrawled through a few reader's hand within the margins, might be extra fascinating than the text." Santayana himself used to be an inveterate maker of notes within the margins of his books, writing (although smartly, by no means scrawling) reviews that remove darkness from, contest, or curiously extend the author's suggestion. those volumes provide a range of Santayana's marginalia, transcribed from books in his own library. those notes supply the reader an strange standpoint on Santayana's existence and paintings. he's by way of turns serious (often), approving (seldom), literary, slangy, frivolous, or even spiteful. The notes convey his humor, his occasional outcry at a writer's folly, his situation for the niceties of English prose and the putting of Greek accessory marks.
These volumes checklist alphabetically through writer all of the books extant that belonged to Santayana, reproducing a range of his annotations meant to be of use to the reader or scholar of Santayana's inspiration, his paintings, and his lifestyles. each one access features a headnote with the author's identify, the name of the paintings, short ebook details, and the library position of the e-book. no longer all marginalia from a given textual content is integrated; the notes were chosen for content material and style.
Santayana, usually residing in solitude, spent loads of his time chatting with, and speaking again to, a superb miscellany of writers, from Spinoza to Kant to J. S. Mill to Bertrand Russell. those notes rfile these conversations.
Is the single Benefactor (also the single enemy). 1:32 George Santayana’s Marginalia 36 p 478 Fué por el amor de Dios que puede amar a los hombres1 Love is the infallible signal that the great is the truth which pulls us. [This can be taken as Santayana’s gloss on his Spanish verse.] 1 It was once for the affection of God / that he can love mankind. 37 p 481 Love is the lifetime of the sweetheart. 38 p 495 [Fotuhat quoted.] Love is irrational. mind's eye is the lover’s alternative either for concepts and for.
He was once a pragmatist. 33 p 261fn, underlined [Footnote three, a citation from the Canonice, ii, § 87:] […] PFNB JP UFSYTBO JPUNUYJN KZXNTQTLMRFYTO,1 […]. [Santayana’s translation:] Hypotheses needs to stay hypothetical and should be quite a few. This, in spite of the fact that, should have cooled the dogmatism of Epicurus. 1 And defies any medical reasoning. 34 p 273 ||The Epicurean consciously close himself off from social and political life|| and left him a thinker stranded to all intents and reasons on a.
both of a white, or a black, or a tawny, a directly, or a crooked, a tall, or a low, or a middle-sized guy. ?Isn’t this rather very unlikely to the mind's eye? 2 p 24 ||It is mostly held that|| all wisdom and demonstration are approximately common notions,|| and Berkeley agrees,|| yet then it doesn't seem to me that these notions are shaped through abstraction. this can be a query of the genesis of rules. Cf. Wundt. three p 24 the topic is especially even more elaborate than this makes it. We steadily.
Former bankruptcy i attempted to teach, in brief, that the life of evil provides no reliable floor for an objection opposed to our Absolute. Evil and strong aren't illusions, yet they're most probably appearances. they're one-sided points, each one over-ruled and transmuted within the complete. 1:88 George Santayana’s Marginalia this can be metaphysical no longer ethical pondering, and the writer turns out to intend that no item, no lifestyles, is de facto reliable or undesirable, i.e. reliable or undesirable antecedently. eighty four p 405 excitement isn't really.
word, “brain-motion.”] How can this exist if no longer identified, based on you? five p seventy one, marked [A] cerebral photo is in basic terms an concept of a potential conception in my brain. What depths of nonsense for consistency! 6 p ninety four How shallow this profundity! in any case, the utilitarians cross a lot deeper than their critics. 7 p one hundred and one, marked realize that i'm endeavering to explain the evidence of the ethical emotions of Englishmen, resembling they're now. N.B. = “I am no moralist.” eight p 107, marked ||The Greek ethical.