"Have You Seen . . . ?": A Personal Introduction to 1,000 Films
a couple of thousand pages within the voice of our so much provocative modern movie critic and historian—a beneficiant historical past of movie and an attractive severe appraisal written with as a lot humor and fervour as historic knowledge.
Juxtaposing the fanciful and the really good, the outdated favorites and the forgotten, this sweeping assortment offers the movies that Thomson bargains to reply to the query he will get requested such a lot often—“What may still I see?” now not content material to decide on basically his personal best motion pictures, Thomson has created an inventory that would shock and enjoyment you—and ship you in your DVD participant. yet he additionally probes the query: After 100 years of movie, which of them are the easiest, and why?
“Have You obvious . . . ?” indicates a real canon of cinema and is a needs to for a person who loves the silver reveal: the best confection to dip into for a flavor of controversy, little-known proof, and concepts approximately what to work out. You’ll are looking to go back to this quantity repeatedly, like a pricey yet argumentative buddy in the dead of night on the video clips.
holding a few mystery? Kaspar Hauser is predicated on truth, or history’s style for tale. In Nuremberg in 1828, a sixteen-year-old looks. He has been saved locked up all his existence, yet now he desires to sign up for the cavalry. he's a savage, within the feel that he has had no schooling. he's installed detention center, and the inexorable try on his being and soul starts. He learns a few phrases. he's installed a circus. a sensible instructor takes him on. Kaspar turns into unsatisfied. he's attacked. he's murdered. The post-mortem experiences.
internal obsession. He by no means makes Leyte glance as tragically attractive as, say, Mizoguchi may have controlled. take into account that, he by no means does these huge-screen-and-five-hundred-landing-craft photographs that Eastwood’s lighting tricks can deal with. but when you need to shudder on the glance on gaunt faces contemplating and reflecting on cannibalism, then Fires at the simple is the one movie. Eastwood’s Iwo Jima conflict movie is very like a Warner Brothers task from 1945 during which all of the roles have long gone eastern.
Pard; and Marie Garson (Ida Lupino), a gangster’s moll who turns into his unswerving good friend. because the police shut in, Roy is compelled deeper and deeper into the Sierra and his personal depression. yet within the procedure, he abandons the traditional snarling of gangster speak. this is often the man who, on first being published from criminal, is going to a park and feels the grass less than his ft. This was once a Mark Hellinger construction, directed through Raoul Walsh and published in January 1941 (well sooner than The Maltese Falcon, the place.
Unsteady clutch of the nightmare in what he has performed is either fascinating and scary. Coyness and the matter-of-fact pass shut jointly. Holly’s voice-over is artless and ordinary, but i will be able to think it being studiously rewritten. And the finishing, with equipment well-known via country soldiers as a Deaner, is just too tidy. yet that very patness is helping us see how a ways the “Badlands” should not actual kingdom yet an imagined position. Altogether, this can be probably the most intriguing American debuts on movie, and an image.
Powell, yet Louis B. Mayer objected to Loy. He suggestion she used to be an excessive amount of of a woman. yet Van Dyke fought for her and Mayer stated, okay, if she’s on hand in 3 weeks for an additional photo. and that's why he and James Wong Howe shot the skinny guy in 16 days (with days for retakes). we're conversing approximately chemistry the following, in addition to alcohol, and the truth that Powell and Loy could do fourteen images jointly. Loy bills for it in addition to somebody: “I performed in a different way with invoice. He used to be so.