Keynes Hayek: The Clash that Defined Modern Economics

Keynes Hayek: The Clash that Defined Modern Economics

Nicholas Wapshott


“I defy anybody―Keynesian, Hayekian, or uncommitted―to learn [Wapshott’s] paintings and never examine whatever new.”―John Cassidy, The New Yorker

because the inventory industry crash of 1929 plunged the realm into turmoil, males emerged with competing claims on easy methods to restoration stability to economies long gone awry. John Maynard Keynes, the mercurial Cambridge economist, believed that executive had an obligation to spend while others wouldn't. He met his contrary in a little-known Austrian economics professor, Freidrich Hayek, who thought of makes an attempt to interfere either unnecessary and in all likelihood harmful. The conflict strains therefore drawn, Keynesian economics could dominate for many years and coincide with an period of unheard of prosperity, yet conservative economists and political leaders could ultimately embody and execute Hayek's opposite vision.

From their first face-to-face come upon to the heated arguments among their ardent disciples, Nicholas Wapshott right here reveals the modern relevance of Keynes and Hayek, as present-day arguments over the virtues of the unfastened industry and executive intervention rage with a similar ferocity as they did within the Nineteen Thirties.

Show sample text content

Download sample