Lies, Damned Lies, and Drug War Statistics: A Critical Analysis of Claims Made by the Office of National Drug Control Policy (2nd Edition)
Matthew B. Robinson, Renee G. Scherlen
Revised and up to date variation that analyses how the workplace of nationwide Drug keep an eye on coverage employs information to misleadingly declare the battle on medicines is a success.
First released in 2007, Lies, Damned Lies, and Drug warfare facts significantly analyzed claims made via the workplace of nationwide Drug keep an eye on coverage (ONDCP), the White condo corporation of responsibility within the nation’s drug struggle seeing that 1989, as present in the six versions of the once a year nationwide Drug keep watch over method among 2000 and 2005. during this revised and up to date moment variation in their severely acclaimed paintings, Matthew B. Robinson and Renee G. Scherlen learn seven more moderen variants (2006–2012) to once more make certain if ONDCP correctly and in truth offers info or deliberately distorts proof to justify carrying on with the drug conflict. They discover the various ways that ONDCP manipulates records and visually provides that info to the general public. Their research demonstrates a drug warfare that continually fails to lessen drug use, drug fatalities, or health problems linked to drug use; fails to supply remedy for drug-dependent clients; and drives up the costs of substances. They finish with coverage innovations for reforming ONDCP’s use of facts, in addition to how the kingdom fights the struggle on drugs.
Praise for the 1st Edition
“Lies, Damned Lies, and Drug conflict information is strangely effortless to learn, and Robinson and Scherlen have performed an important want not just to critics of present drug coverage through compiling this damning critique of ONDCP claims, but additionally to a person drawn to how information is compiled, provided, and misused through bureaucrats trying to defend their domain names. it's going to be required interpreting for contributors of Congress.” — Drug battle Chronicle e-book Review
“The authors have played a beneficial provider to our democracy with their meticulous research of the White condominium ONDCP public statements and reviews. they've got pulled the sheet off what seems to be an reputable coverage of deception utilizing smart and infrequently clumsy makes an attempt at statistical manipulation. This rfile, finally, supplies us a map of the truth.” — Mike grey, writer of Drug loopy: How We bought into This Mess and the way we will be able to Get Out
“Robinson and Scherlen make a priceless contribution to documenting how ONDCP fails to dwell as much as uncomplicated criteria of responsibility and consistency.” — Ethan Nadelmann, govt Director, Drug coverage Alliance
procedure started in earnest.”29 In 1919, the Treasury division all started arresting medical professionals who wrote opiate prescriptions for addicts. “The courts have been usually in contract with the legislation enforcement place, and in a chain of selections throughout the subsequent 3 years (1919–1922), the perfect court docket successfully prohibited physicians from prescribing narcotics to addicts.”30 one of many judgements, Webb v. usa (1919), “held that it used to be unlawful for medical professionals to dispense prescribed drugs to relieve.
info gathered in 1999 or after. This makes long term reviews of ONDCP from 1988 to 2011 most unlikely, together with tests of ONDCP’s objectives said in bankruptcy 2. in addition, as famous within the 2003 technique, extra “improvements” within the NHSDA in 2002 make comparisons of information accumulated sooner than and after 2002 beside the point. in truth, the identify of the survey was once replaced to the nationwide Survey on Drug Use and overall healthiness (NSDUH).6 That the government may let its fundamental resource of drug use.
traits from NSDUH. however it did name on such information on the way to “prove” that the drug battle is operating (as within the quote simply stated), in addition to to generate alarm, as within the following quote: “One of the extra irritating information tendencies pointed out long ago a number of years is a dramatic upward thrust in present drug use between adults elderly 50–54.”102 it's cheating of ONDCP to say good fortune in assembly its objectives of decreasing drug use by means of 10% and 25% over and 5 years, respectively, whilst it is just assessing drug.
Garnering public aid throughout the media by utilizing “constructors” who supply facts of the matter. Claims-makers then “typify” the drug challenge by means of characterizing its nature.23 for instance, illicit medicinal drugs are typiﬁed as “harmful” even if used responsibly or recreationally. 10 Lies, Damned Lies, and Drug warfare data they're characterised as “bad” whatever the context within which they're getting used. Any illicit drug use is incorrect no matter if it's not abuse.24 ultimately, illicit medicinal drugs are.
components: “the drug addict is a violent felony, the addict is an ethical degenerate (e.g., a liar, thief, etc.), drug peddlers and addicts are looking to convert others into addicts, and the addict takes medicinal drugs due to an irregular personality.”26 one other instance is the typiﬁcation of using marijuana, as indicated in a pamphlet circulated by way of the Bureau of Narcotics within the Nineteen Thirties: lengthy use of Marihuana often develops a delirious rage which occasionally results in excessive crimes, resembling attack and.