Redskins: Insult and Brand

Redskins: Insult and Brand


The Washington Redskins franchise is still probably the most beneficial in specialist activities, partially as a result of its simply recognizable, well known, and ecocnomic brand.
 

And but “redskins” is a derogatory identify for American Indians.

The variety of grassroots campaigns to alter the identify has risen in recent times regardless of the present staff owner’s statement that the staff will never achieve this. Franchise proprietors counter feedback via arguing that the group identify is optimistic and a time period of admire and honor that many American Indians include. The NFL, for its half, actively defends the identify and helps it in court.

popular newshounds, politicians, and previous avid gamers have publicly spoken out opposed to using “Redskins” because the identify of the group. Sportscaster Bob Costas denounced the identify as a racial slur in the course of a halftime convey in 2013. U.S. consultant Betty McCollum marched open air the stadium with different protesters––among them former Minnesota Vikings participant Joey Browner––urging that the identify be changed.

Redskins: Insult and Brand examines how the continuing fight over the staff identify increases very important questions on how white americans understand American Indians, in regards to the cultural energy of customer manufacturers, and approximately carrying on with hindrances to inclusion and equality. C. Richard King examines the historical past of the team’s identify, the evolution of the time period “redskin,” and a number of the ways that humans either help and oppose its use this day. King’s hard-hitting method of the team’s brand and mascot exposes the irritating historical past of a moniker’s organization with the NFL—a multibillion-dollar entity that accepts public funds—as good as renowned attitudes towards local americans today.

Show sample text content

Download sample