The Epistemology of Disagreement: New Essays

The Epistemology of Disagreement: New Essays


The Epistemology of Disagreement brings jointly essays from a dozen philosophers at the epistemic importance of war of words; all yet one of many essays are new. Questions mentioned contain: whilst (if ever) does the confrontation of others require a rational agent to revise her ideals? Do 'conciliatory' money owed, on which brokers are required to revise considerably, be afflicted by deadly difficulties of self-defeat, given the confrontation approximately war of words? what's the value of confrontation approximately philosophical subject matters specifically? How does the epistemology of war of words relate to broader epistemic theorizing? Does the elevated importance of a number of disagreeing brokers depend upon their being self reliant of each other? John Hawthorne and Amia Srinivasan, Thomas Kelly, and Brian Weatherson all weigh in with assaults on conciliatory perspectives or defenses of non-conciliatory methods. David Christensen and Stewart Cohen absorb the other aspect of the talk. Bryan Frances, Sanford Goldberg, and Ernest Sosa talk about one of those confrontation that may be of specific problem to so much readers of this ebook: confrontation approximately philosophy. And Robert Audi, Jonathan Kvanvig, and Jennifer Lackey take on a few normal theoretical concerns that endure on disagreement.

The philosophers represented right here comprise a few who've contributed actively to the war of words literature already, in addition to a few who're exploring the difficulty for the 1st time. Their paintings is helping to deepen and extend our knowing of a few epistemic phenomena which are vital to any considerate believer's engagement with different believers.

Show sample text content

Download sample