The Truth About Canada: Some Important, Some Astonishing, and Some Truly Appalling Things All Canadians Should Know About Our Country
popular as a passionate Canadian, bestselling writer Mel Hurtig has combed via international records to work out how Canada relatively measures up — and the implications are remarkable, and sometimes shocking.
This ebook is ready how Canada has replaced, a great deal for the more severe, within the final 20 years. because of those profound (often hidden) alterations, we're not the folks we predict we're. To take one instance, the Canadian media frequently leaves us with the impact that Canadians are fairly seriously taxed. convinced, in comparison to the usa, the standard element of comparability. No, in comparison to different nations with our lifestyle, different OECD international locations, for instance; there we are available twenty third at the high-tax scale.
The shocks during this e-book building up, bankruptcy via bankruptcy. How will we rank on the earth in voter turnout? attempt 109th. variety of physicians according to 100,000 inhabitants? attempt 54th. Our rank in decreasing pollutants? 126th out of 146 countries.
Some of the information are inner, evaluating Canada then and now. They again up of the book’s strongest topics: the failure of Canadian monstrous company to show checklist gains into ongoing funding in our kingdom, and (no twist of fate) the sellout of our resources at a cost that no different kingdom could allow.
This statistics-based ebook levels throughout all parts of our lives — together with future health, wages, productiveness, tradition, the media (“the such a lot centred within the world”), and masses else. Mel Hurtig’s message is that we can’t do whatever to mend the course we’re drifting in until we realize it — and realize The fact approximately Canada.
From the Hardcover edition.
Constituency applicants, no matter if representing a celebration or working independently, plus a greatest of $1,100 to a celebration management candidate. This circulation by means of Stephen Harper astonished many observers. both marvelous is the truth that Harper hasn’t abolished the cruel limits on third-party election ads and election donations, whatever he vigorously hostile prior to turning into best minister. in addition to agencies and exchange unions, teams and institutions can now not make political donations,.
As a really great guy, regardless of the antonym for aura is, Dion has it. His functionality as Liberal chief has been uninspiring. celebration fundraising is negative, and it’s no mystery that by way of the autumn of 2007 a few Liberals had already been attempting to imagine up methods of exchanging him. through past due 2007, an Angus Reid ballot acknowledged Stephen Harper used to be most popular as top Minister through 33 percentage in comparison to in basic terms 14 percentage for Stéphane Dion. Of curiosity is that almost all of these polled opted for neither. we all know.
convention on alternate and improvement, October 2007. four. the present, CBC Radio, June 14, 2007. five. monetary put up, June 14, 2007. 6. Globe and Mail, February 2007. 7. Globe and Mail, June 27, 2007. eight. nationwide publish, might nine, 2007. nine. Globe and Mail, August 28, 2006. 10. Leonard Farber, Ogilvy Renault LLP, Globe and Mail, April four, 2007. eleven. monetary put up, June four, 2007. 12. Globe and Mail, July 1, 2007. thirteen. Letter from Chamber of trade president and previous Conservative cupboard minister.
Canada, in tax coverage the space among the desires of massive company and the priorities of so much Canadians is big. With swiftly growing to be company gains, resources, and focus of possession, the space has been getting higher, and after the Harper government’s 2007 mini-budget, the space can be a lot better sooner or later. As we know, large company stridently believes huge tax cuts for companies were an urgently required precedence. How do so much Canadians consider? A late-2005 ballot through Decima.
Sale of Alliance Atlantis: “This is a lawyered deal representing creeping American keep watch over, overseas possession by way of the again door.” finally, from television critic John Doyle, commenting at the new CRTC chairman’s recommendation that we'd like “a lighter process” to television law: “Less legislation of broadcasting in Canada is an eccentric proposition. Bluntly placed, there are a few those that could make the moderate element that our airwaves were heavily polluted. we're awash in American community drama in.