The Writing of the Disaster
Word—why? yet why not?—one ought maybe to talk of a subjectivity with none topic: the wounded area, the damage of the death, the already useless physique which nobody may perhaps ever personal, or ever say of it, I, my physique. this is often the physique lively completely via mortal wish: the will of dying—desire that dies and doesn't thereby subside. Solitude or noninteriority, publicity to the skin, boundless dispersion, the impossibility of preserving enterprise, inside bounds, enclosed—such is guy disadvantaged of humanity,.
Befalling, the catastrophe by no means does befall. by no means as soon as, yet ever once more. It repeats, yet nothing; it's the recurrence of no incidence (it is “outside” the area of phenomena, of experience—“hors phénomène, hors expérience,” Blanchot says); it isn't anything’s go back, yet go back “itself.” four. chances are you'll say it's the go back of the time there's not—the first time, the final time, the “one and in basic terms time” of the catastrophe which, taking place, obliterates incidence. This “absence of time” is.
The decline; it has no opposite, and it isn't the straightforward (whence the truth that not anything is extra international to it than the dialectic, whether the dialectic have been diminished to its damaging moment). He questions us: what we do, how we are living, who're our acquaintances. he's discreet, as though his questions didn't query. And while in our flip we ask him what he does, he smiles, rises, and it really is as though he had by no means been current. issues run their path. He doesn't hassle us. The inexperience of demise. This.
None past; nor does this data be successful itself, and there's therefore no presence of data both. don't practice an information; don't repeat it. adequate of concept which wields and organizes wisdom. the following house opens to “fictive theory,” and conception, via fiction, comes into risk of death. You theoreticians, recognize that you're mortal, and that concept is already dying in you. comprehend this, be familiar with your better half. maybe it's precise that “without theorizing, you wouldn't take one step.
second of concession—not in depression, yet as though this have been the unhoped for: the desire the catastrophe promises. unhappy and unsatisfiable wish, but in no way damaging. there's not anything damaging in “not to write”; it really is depth with no mastery, with out sovereignty, the obsessiveness of the definitely passive. To fail with no fail: this can be a signal of passivity. to need to jot down: what an absurdity. Writing is the decay of the desire, simply because it is the lack of strength, and the autumn of the average fall.