Tragically Speaking: On the Use and Abuse of Theory for Life (Symploke Studies in Contemporary Theory)
From German idealism onward, Western thinkers have sought to revalue tragedy, constantly converging at one cardinal element: tragic artwork hazards aestheticizing actual violence. Tragically Speaking severely examines this revaluation, providing a brand new knowing of the altering that means of tragedy in literary and ethical discourse. It questions universal assumptions in regards to the Greeks’ philosophical relation to the tragic culture and concerning the moral and political ramifications of up to date theories of tragedy.
Starting with the poet Friedrich Hölderlin and carrying on with to the current, Kalliopi Nikolopoulou strains how tragedy was once translated into an concept (“the tragic”) that used to be then revised additional into the “beyond the tragic” of postmetaphysical modern inspiration. whereas spotting a few of the advantages of this revaluation, Tragically Speaking concentrates at the losses implicit in this type of flip. It argues that through translating tragedy into an concept, those rereadings effected a tricky subordination of politics to ethics: the drama of human clash gave method to philosophical mirrored image, bracketing the area in prefer of the belief of the realm. the place modern inspiration valorizes absence, passivity, the opposite, rhetoric, writing, and textuality, the writer argues that their “deconstructed opposites” (presence, will, the self, fact, speech, and motion, all of that are important to tragedy) are both precious for any significant dialogue of ethics and politics.
back: “To shape a ‘just resemblance, and, whilst, a handsomer one’, being continuously the executive rule they saw, . . . they need to, of necessity, be speculated to have had in view a extra beauteous and extra ideal nature” (65). although Hegel excluded any point out of nature from his aesthetics, his personal knowing of the spiritualized personality that inheres in art’s sensuous shape echoes Winckelmann’s. therefore, imitation of nature consists of additionally extra; it contains going past empirical.
Park booklet Fund, collage at Buffalo. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication info Nikolopoulou, Kalliopi. Tragically talking : at the use and abuse of conception for all times/ Kalliopi Nikolopoulou. p. cm. — (Symploke experiences in modern conception) contains bibliographical references and index. isbn 978-0-8032-4091-9 (pbk. : alk. paper) 1. Tragedy — historical past and feedback — thought, and so forth. 2. Tragic, The. I. name. pn1892.n54 2012 809'.9162 — dc23 2012026188 Set in Arno by way of Laura Wellington.
Or shared impact can such an ironic solipsism reveal? The query of have an effect on is inextricable from the query of content material, and reason why de Duve rightly issues out that, confronted with the hollowness of the readymade, one can't discuss the content material of one’s have an effect on yet easily in regards to the presence of an indeterminate “feeling of getting whatever to do with paintings” (de Duve 20). this can be additionally for Agamben the enigma of recent paintings: Why is it that for all of the politicization of paintings these days, our political.
Blow whilst doubt changed trust. therefore, genealogy’s explanatory strength lies accurately in its obdurate normativity, its scandalously subjective objectivity, no longer within the pursuit of summary, conceptual routines that supply basically the objectivity of the relative. due to their entrenched subjective nature, genealogies develop into websites of contestation and therefore invested paths to fact, no longer philosophical pseudotranscendentals. Nietzsche, who understood that every one philosophy is de facto biography, practiced.
Socrates in a chiasmatic relation wherein Lysias is current via his writing, whereas Socrates needs to absent himself from his speech. nonetheless, unlike Socrates who wears it out of a feeling of disgrace, the cloak tricks on the shamelessness of these who take pleasure in irresponsible speech simply because they're sheltered (by the cloaks of planned or fortuitous absence, rhetoric, energy, and so on) from exhibiting their faces. therefore, similar to the cloak implies the moral.